Back in the zone is the Representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations. Which means, it must be said bluntly, failure FFKM in mediation. So we wait another group Malagasy mediators because the situation will get worse by the day if no negotiation is taken. The UN envoy stressed again the fact that this problem is particularly among the Malagasy, so the solution must be sought in the negotiations between Malagasy.
Given this position of United Nations mediators Malagasy must take control over the FFKM. Unless the remaining three counts of churches do still trust the two protagonists. Unfortunately, the next president installed, we do not expect much. Find a committee of the Malagasy credible negotiation becomes a problem in the current context. Indeed, in my humble opinion, if found, they must be, above all, "Raiamandreny" and not politicians. They will be, too, accused of supporters, besides they can not not be.
What justifies the call of Bishop at the UN and the armed forces. In clear, we need a conviction to get out of this impasse. The deteriorating situation in Tulear, February 26, 2009 yesterday and this deadly disorder in Fianarantsoa, this afternoon of February 27, 2009, proves once again the inability of opposition leaders (CRN or TGV) to avoid overflows. Looting and blockades of roads (not to mention other "nonsense") took place in the region Atsimo Andrefana. They can not escape because they are the instigators of this event. Moreover, the policy is neither more nor less than that adopted in Antananarivo.
It's enough to wonder: is it necessary to destroy all cost to build? Should he sacrifice his countrymen to quench his thirst for power? This betrays a strong motivation to anarchism. We must abolish the state because it is a radical evil. What a mess!
Frankly, these gentlemen of the opposition are enormous mistake to proceed by violence to solve this problem. They spread violence to collect democracy. But this is nonsense ... There are "raiamandreny, known throughout Madagascar, among these chiefs, yet their mentality is obviously deplorable. Expected of them as a catalyst for peace and understanding in opposition or in the country, but their approach is diabolical to think otherwise: they are troublemakers, agitators of civil war. Shame!
Can we count on such people to run the country? Instead of Marc Ravalomanana, head of state, who would man the opposition has the confidence of the Malagasy people to be its President and pride?
Point Reflection find the outcome of this political conflict. It is also recognized by newspapers and websites that Malagasy Rajoelina focused his claims yesterday, Monday, February 23, 2009, on three points:
- The resignation of the government of Jacques RABEMANANJARA, - Access to the RNM and TVM,
- The release of Mr. Jean Theodore Ranjivason, former Minister of Education, First, Public Service and Social Legislation, after the Government of Jacques Sylla.
These conditions were not met, it will be in place May 13 with his supporters. Therefore, events will resume!
Meanwhile, Marc Ravalomanana has merely reiterated its willingness to listen to his people and openness. First portal to reflect
Anyway, the transition similar to a Zero start is fatal to the country. Donors will not be leaving to finance new projects like those already in progress were worthless. Thousands of dollars have been allocated. Much to make a change of government, according to this request Rajoelina, however, accepting the conditions for the continuity of power. Yes, for an open government, but not for a government that will sweep away everything that was done for seven years. The U.S. Ambassador said even that "extra-constitutional situation implies a suspension of aid pending a legal status (see sobika.com, over the events of 24 February). The leader of this event must walk on eggshells in this process of negotiation, instead insisting on imposing conditions on conditions.
He must understand that he is not alone in experiencing the beneficial way to overcome this crisis. In a negotiation, the two parties should respect and accept the concession. In truth, he must try with Marc Ravalomanana, and why not, the mediators, the solution. This will be the result of ideas from each other but not the private property of one individual who claims to represent the people. By
Moreover, one wonders again until now what he wants behind all these conditions? Can it not be more clear? I define, in fact, the condition as follows: "that without which something can be done." So what does he want to achieve once these conditions met? This was the "absolute snag. Be clear
Mr. Andry. Unmask yourself. The Malagasy people is eager to have at least a quiet life. You, you only to plunge into the abyss of misery with all this litany of conditions. And for the days to come, what else?
Adymadio
0 comments:
Post a Comment